Buy custom Chapter 8 - Conscientious Objection

Essay's paper info

Essay's paper body

The military’s broad definition of “religious training and belief” comes

from the Supreme Court’s interpretation of that phrase as used in the draft law. In US v

Seeger and Welsh v US, the Supreme Court held that given the variety of religious belief,

when Congress defined “religious training and belief” as “belief in a relation to a

Supreme Being involving duties superior to those arising from any human relation,” it

must have meant something broader than belief in a God...

The Court held that it also

included moral or ethical beliefs which occupy the same place in the life of the applicant

as the belief in a traditional deity holds in the lives of traditionally religious people.

The military has chosen to adopt the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the draft law’s

definition of “religious training and belief...

General points of the essay

Conformation to the Supreme Court FDR Supreme Court Packing US Supreme Court Justices Supreme Court Justice Supreme Court Justice Nominations Supreme Court Bush and the supreme court Chapter 8 - Conscientious Objection Supreme Court in a Democracy How Successful Have Psychological Approaches Been In Accounting For Religious Belief And Experience? Compare And Contrast Two Approaches And Critically Assess Their Contribution To Our Understanding Of Religious Behaviour U.S. Supreme Court Atwater vs. Supreme court Pacifism & Conscientious Objection Supreme Court Needs a change The Supreme Court

Essays related to the topic